Hydropower Potential Pyramid

Page status
Working page
Updated
2026-05-13

Open in the interactive explorer and map

Summary

The reduction from theoretical potential to actually installed capacity. The 28x gap reflects successive filtering from theoretical potential to installed capacity, with each filter representing a systems constraint rather than a resource absence. For the interpretive framing of this gap as a systems-conversion failure, see Master Thesis and Bottleneck Hierarchy.

Key Figure

Hydropower potential pyramid from theoretical potential to installed capacity
The headline theoretical hydropower number narrows sharply as physical, technical, economic, and delivery filters are applied.

The Pyramid

Level Capacity (MW) What It Means Source
Theoretical (legacy) 83,000–83,500 Every drop at every elevation, perfect efficiency Historical / political
Gross (WECS 2019) 72,544 Updated screening with revised methodology WECS Assessment of Hydropower Potential of Nepal (2019)
Technical ~42,000–46,000 Apply realistic efficiency, environmental minimums World Bank Nepal Power-Sector Evidence Record (2018–2025), WECS
Techno-economic (WECS 2019) 32,680 Screened for development realism WECS Assessment of Hydropower Potential of Nepal (2019)
Economically viable (range) 25,000–35,000 Add transmission, terrain, social, financial constraints source-review estimate
Realistically developable by 2040 10,000–15,000 Add financing limits, institutional capacity, geopolitics source-review estimate
Actually installed (FY 2024/25 NEA cut-off) 3,591 Annual-report installed generation snapshot NEA Annual Report FY 2024/25
DoED registry (>1 MW plants, Apr 10 2026) 3,791.874 More current licensing-registry operating tally DoED registry used in Nepal Energy Profile

Basin Distribution of Gross Potential (WECS 2019)

Basin Gross Potential (MW) Share
Koshi Basin 27,805 38.3%
Karnali Basin 20,385 28.1%
Gandaki Basin 19,803 27.3%
All other basins ~4,551 6.3%
Total 72,544 100%

~94% of gross potential is concentrated in the three major Himalayan basins.

Key Distinctions

These categories are routinely conflated in Nepal's public discourse:

Category What It Is What It Is NOT
Installed MW Nameplate scale When energy arrives or how dependable it is
Annual GWh Total generation over a year Dry-season availability
Firm Power Dependable year-round dispatchable output Same as installed capacity
Export-grade power Firm, bankable, transmission-connected Seasonal surplus dumped at spot prices

Coverage / Method

This pyramid is compiled from multiple sources with different methodologies:

  • WECS 2019 gross potential: Basin-scale GIS screening with revised hydrology and efficiency assumptions.
  • Technical / techno-economic levels: WECS screening plus World Bank power-sector reform assessment constraints.
  • Economically viable / realistically developable: Expert estimates from source-review synthesis; not hard thresholds.
  • Installed / DoED registry: Administrative counts from NEA annual reports and Department of Electricity Development licensing data.

Intermediate levels (economically viable, realistically developable) are order-of-magnitude estimates, not precise cutoffs. They should not be cited as definitive ceilings.

Caveats

  • Intermediate levels (economically viable, realistically developable) are expert estimates, not hard thresholds.
  • The "realistically developable by 2040" figure depends on financing, institutional capacity, and geopolitical assumptions that are not model-derived.
  • Basin distribution reflects gross potential only; installed capacity distribution differs because buildability, transmission, and market access vary by basin.
  • The 83,000 MW legacy figure is politically durable but methodologically outdated.

Linked Data

Linked Figures

Chart Specification

The inline funnel chart now shows the progressive reduction from 83,000 MW to 3,591 MW. The basin-potential figure remains the geographic companion to this page.

Sources