NEA 960 MW National Solar Tender

Page status
Working page
Updated
2026-05-13

Open in the interactive explorer and map

Summary

The single largest solar procurement event in Nepal's history. A national-scale competitive-bid tender launched 2024 for 960 MWp of utility-scale grid-tied solar PV across Nepal, awarded to 63 projects from multiple IPPs. PPA signing and financial closure staged over FY 2025/26 and FY 2026/27; if ~70% of awards reach COD, Nepal's operating utility solar expands ~5× over the current fleet by FY 2028/29.

The tender that represents the institutional bet that Nepal's solar scaling can be delivered through competitive IPP PPAs — not donor-funded NEA self-build, not off-grid AEPC programmes.

Key Facts

Item Value
Total capacity tendered 960 MWp
Number of projects selected 63
Typical project size 5–25 MWp
Geographic distribution Terai-dominant (Madhesh + Lumbini + Sudurpaschim + Koshi provinces)
Procurement model Tariff-based competitive bidding
Tariff range (awarded) NPR 4.99–5.54/kWh (NEA corrected LoI) ≈ $0.037–$0.041
PPA tenor 25 years, standard NEA PPA structure
Grid integration study Cumulative Grid Impact Study completed FY 2024/25 under World Bank Grid Solar and Energy Efficiency Project TA line
Expected PPA closures FY 2025/26–2026/27
Expected first CODs FY 2026/27
Expected full portfolio COD FY 2028/29 (if ~70% conversion rate)

Tender structure by province (approximate)

Province MW in tender (approx.) Notes
Madhesh (Bara, Parsa, Rautahat, Sarlahi, Dhanusha) ~350–400 Densest Terai grid; most bids received
Lumbini (Nawalparasi, Rupandehi, Kapilvastu, Banke) ~200–250 Hetauda-Bharatpur-Bardaghat corridor access
Sudurpaschim (Kailali, Kanchanpur) ~80–120 Far-west Terai
Koshi (Jhapa, Morang, Sunsari, Saptari) ~150–200 Eastern backbone
Bagmati (Makwanpur, Chitwan) ~30–60 Central, smaller allocations
Gandaki + Karnali (limited) ~20–40 Hydro co-location and resource-zone pockets
Total ~960

The geographic weighting toward Terai provinces reflects the Solar Resource Geography of Nepal grid-adjacency priority — most awards sit within 10 km of existing 132 or 220 kV substations on the Hetauda–Dhalkebar–Inaruwa 400 kV Backbone and Dana–Kushma–New Butwal 220 kV Corridor.

Why this tender matters (beyond the MW)

Four reasons:

1. It establishes the price floor for Nepal solar.

The awarded tariff range (4.99–5.54 NPR/kWh) is the first portfolio-scale solar price discovery in Nepal. Earlier rounds (Phase I at 8.40, Phase III around the 6.40 band) were single-digit-count project awards; 960 MW with 63 awards is the first price point that reflects actual competitive equilibrium. The tariff is a current benchmark for comparing future project evaluations against older 2017-era numbers.

2. It validates the market.

63 IPPs winning awards implies a functional pipeline of developers, advisors, local EPC firms, and debt financiers. The Nepal solar market was single-digit-developer-deep before this tender; it is now dozens-of-developer-deep. This matters more than the physical MW — a market of depth 1 cannot scale; a market of depth 60 can.

3. It stress-tests the institutional fit.

The tender has four binding constraints: land acquisition (Terai agricultural politics), grid integration (penetration levels, forecast management), financial close (local-currency long-tenor debt), PPA discipline (NEA single-buyer liability). If the tender's 70%+ of awards reach COD on the FY 2026–28 schedule, the model works; if conversion falls below 50%, each of these four binding constraints becomes a programme-level fix.

4. It is the test case for Agrivoltaics and Land.

The first awarded projects will surface which land-acquisition model works at scale. If pure-purchase / fee-simple conversion dominates and succeeds, agrivoltaics is merely an add-on. If land-acquisition delays kill > 30% of awards, agrivoltaic lease templates become a programme-level requirement for the next tender round.

Tariff context

The tender tariff sits at the crossover point between solar and hydro (Solar LCOE Crossover):

Benchmark Price (NPR/kWh)
960 MW tender awarded (capacity-weighted) ~5.43
NEA small RoR hydro PPA (blended) 6.20
NEA PRoR hydro PPA (blended) 6.80
NEA time-weighted-value of solar ~4.80
NEA time-weighted-value of small RoR ~7.00

Each MW in this tender is already materially cheaper than equivalent small RoR hydro on a blended basis and ~30% cheaper on a time-weighted basis. This is the tariff point that NEA Solar Award Tariffs Undercut the Standard Small-RoR Blended Tariff stands on.

Limitations & Controversies

  • Land acquisition delays. Terai agricultural land politics may stall >30% of awards if fee-simple purchase becomes contentious. Agrivoltaic lease templates are not yet in tender documents.
  • Grid integration at scale. Cumulative Grid Impact Study completed, but actual penetration levels and forecast management at 960 MW+ are untested in Nepal's grid.
  • Financial close risk. Local-currency long-tenor debt availability remains partial; FX risk persists for imported components.
  • PPA settlement delays. NEA single-buyer liability creates counterparty risk; standard PPA mechanisms (escrow, performance guarantees) are untested at this portfolio scale.
  • Weather and monsoon COD delays. Grid-extension coordination and schedule discipline are developer-by-developer variables.
  • Tariff-crash political backlash risk. The transparent bidding process mitigates this, but a future tariff revision or policy reversal could chill investor confidence.

Implementation risks and watch items

Risk Mitigation Status
Land-acquisition delays on fee-simple conversion Lease templates, agrivoltaic structures Not yet in tender docs
Grid-integration penetration issues Completed Grid Impact Study + future BESS requirements First pass complete
Local-currency long-tenor debt availability Nepal Rastra Bank policy; donor blending Partial; FX risk persists
PPA settlement delays from NEA Escrow accounts; performance guarantees Standard PPA mechanisms
Weather / monsoon COD delays Schedule discipline, grid-extension coordination Developer-by-developer
Tariff-crash political backlash Transparent bidding + price disclosure Tender ran transparently

Related

Sources